↓ Skip to main content

Building a memory palace in minutes: Equivalent memory performance using virtual versus conventional environments with the Method of Loci

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Psychologica, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 1,494)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
7 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
248 Mendeley
Title
Building a memory palace in minutes: Equivalent memory performance using virtual versus conventional environments with the Method of Loci
Published in
Acta Psychologica, October 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.09.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric L.G. Legge, Christopher R. Madan, Enoch T. Ng, Jeremy B. Caplan

Abstract

The Method of Loci (MOL) is an ancient mnemonic strategy used to enhance serial recall. Traditionally, the MOL is carried out by imagining navigating a familiar environment and "placing" the to-be-remembered items in specific locations. For retrieval, the mnemonist re-imagines walking through the environment, "looking" for those items in order. Here we test a novel MOL method, where participants use a briefly studied virtual environment as the basis for the MOL and applied the strategy to 10 lists of 11 unrelated words. When our virtual environments were used, the MOL was as effective, compared to an uninstructed control group, as the traditional MOL where highly familiar environments were used. Thus, at least for naïve participants, a highly detailed environment does not support substantially better memory for verbal serial lists.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 237 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 49 20%
Student > Master 48 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 13%
Researcher 23 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 4%
Other 36 15%
Unknown 51 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 57 23%
Computer Science 31 13%
Neuroscience 19 8%
Social Sciences 14 6%
Design 12 5%
Other 57 23%
Unknown 58 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2021.
All research outputs
#729,922
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Acta Psychologica
#48
of 1,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,084
of 202,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Psychologica
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.